Saturday, 27 March 2010

OUR EVALUATION!!!!



Written Evaluation. (An essay of what is discussed in the video!)

1. In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?

After researching and analysing existing music videos of the same genre as ours, we were able to see what conventions were needed for our video.

We included studio shots of the band/singer that we interspersed with shots of several characters who made up our main narrative. We had multiple narratives, depicting 7 sets of characters; each of a different age and in a different location. We therefore, challenged our conventions by including more than one narrative.

We made sure that the singer addressed the audience by singing directly into the camera. We found this to be a typical convention of many music videos; whereby it allows the audience to establish a relationship with the singer.

We wanted the narratives of each of our characters to be shown clearly to make it recognisable for the audience. I think we achieved this by having strong, easy to follow narratives. When analysing existing music videos e.g. Billy Joel – Uptown girl, we took ideas on board to help with our own video. We did however break conventions by adding in a predominant performer not performing in the narratives that were featured in the video but appearing in a solo studio based scene as apposed to being a part of the narrative, which is what is normally done in a typical pop video. Throughout the video, synchronisation was used in regards to editing in time with the beat, along with dance moves and lyrics of the song being adapted to the music. This was essential for our video as accuracy is an essential factor.

Because our video was of the pop genre it was important to take into consideration the mise-en-scene that we would use for each of the characters performances. As we had a vast range of characters; each telling a different story, it was important that the attire of the characters was correct and in keeping with their task.

2. How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary text?

Before creating our ancillary texts we looked at a number of existing products, created to go along with other music videos of the pop genre. There were some clear conventions that we decided to follow such as the song name, artist photos. We had to adopt a house style that would enable a theme to be carried across each of our products to create a clear and recognisable marketing package. We then came to the decision that a picture of the main singer would work well on the each of the products.

One obstacle we were faced with when creating our ancillary products, was creating a package that would attract a wide audience; as we hoped our music video would. It was a challenge to make the ancillary texts appeal to a wide variety of ages, and both to males and females. We did this by keeping each product simplistic but with bright colours, which stand out and share connotations of our chosen genre and dance music.

We wanted our products to convey similar stylistic features, as we understood the target audience would be the same for each. I think we succeeded in reflecting the genre of our video in our ancillary texts, whereby we used bright colours, and photos of the singers. I think that by adopting a similar house style for each of the products we proved that they were promoting the same product. For the advert and the digi-pak we used the same typeface and the same logo, again showing a link between the two.

3. What have you learned from your audience feedback?

Overall I think that our audience feedback has been very positive. Many of our choices made, in filming, editing etc have been praised and liked by those who have watched it, and I therefore think should be pleased with our final product. We set out to produce a music video that stood out from many other ‘‘pop’’ music videos, and I think we succeeded in achieving this by using multiple comical narratives, different mise-en-scenes, a studio character or artist, and a well-known song.

The range of characters was something we wanted the audience to enjoy and something that we decided to incorporate from the beginning. We wanted the audience to be able to relate to them as well as allowing us to appeal to a much wider audience. I think we have successfully managed to attract this wide audience and this can be supported by our audience feedback. The range of ages is something that helps us achieve this. We learnt through some of the feedback that by having an improved range of characters of extreme age or different ethnicities is might have been more successful in terms of censorship. In terms of locations, however, we limited with the type of actors available. I also think that given more time to create the video, we would have been able to include locations outside peoples homes; something that we wanted to include - evident in our original character listings and animatic. If the locations had been more easily accessible we would have been able to include the shots of a workshop, hairdressers, bar, classroom etc. providing us with a bigger range of mise-en-scenes.

The fast cut rate of our video was again something that we set out to achieve from our initial planning stages. We questioned our audience about this when it came to audience feedback; as we were not sure whether the cut rate worked. After gaining feedback, I think our choices involving the cut rate of our video were successful. We wanted the audience to keep watching each character, at first to establish who is who, and later simply to want to see what was going to happen next, and I think we accomplished this by using the fast cut rate not lingering on any one character at any time; this also means that the audience doesn’t get bored.

4. How did you use new media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?

For the initial research stages of researching towards our final product, we used popular and reliable sites like youtube.com, which allowed us to watch and analyse music videos. We also used online encyclopaedias which gave us reliable and beneficial information about our chosen track, ‘Footloose’, as well as information about the conventions and stylistic features of music videos, digipaks and advertisements – helping us when it came to create out final products. We also found the internet to be very helpful when researching online tutorials about how to use relevant software. We knew we were going to be using Final Cut Pro, and Adobe Photoshop during the production stages of our final products, so by researching tutorials and help forums on each program, it gave us a clearer understanding of how to use each. We had also never used the programs before, so the tutorials were essential.

When it came to the construction of our video, we used cameras, lighting and tripods. For the studio scene, in particular, we made use of the lighting and the HD camera –because we wanted these shots to stand out slightly, contrasting with the other shots of our characters dancing. I think we achieved this by having the background, completely blacked out. We experimented with zooms, close ups, long shots and mid shots. This gave us a bigger selection of shots to choose from when it came to editing. For the scenes outside of the studio, the lighting became quite a problem – we had to work around this by choosing rooms and locations that had very a good degree of natural light. However, this made the video inconsistent when it came to lighting, but because of time we had to work around this in post production by using video filters which corrected the colour and lighting of some of our shots. It is still however, evident that lighting was a problem.

When it came to editing, we had already learnt the basics by using the tutorials found online. It was the first time we had used Final Cut Pro. Synchronisation was a key factor in the editing for music videos, and we took this on board for ours – we had to make sure the cut rate was in time with the beat of the music, as well as making sure the lip-syncing and dancing was in time. We found this to be quite a challenge, particularly considering that it was a first attempt at making a music video. However, I think we achieved in making it in time with the music.

For the construction of the digi-pak and advertisement, we used Adobe Photoshop. We made use of layers, and many layer-editing tools that enabled us to create a professional looking advert and digi-pak. In particular, we used drop shadows, outer glows and inner glows – which all helped to make the features of the poster and digi-pak stand out.



Wednesday, 17 March 2010

Audience Feedback!!!



We asked people to watch our music video before interviewing them and asking them set questions, which will go on to help us evaluate how successful or unsuccessful our music video has been in meeting conventions and attracting our target audience etc.


After hearing what other people thought of our music video, and having them answer our questions, overall I think that we succeeded in achieving what we wanted. I think the feedback has been very positive, and many of our choices made for the video have been liked by those who have watched it. There are, however, certain things that we would have liked to have been better, and after hearing our audience feedback we can see what worked and what didn't. We will explain this in our evaluation!!! :D

Tuesday, 16 March 2010

Our Final Music Video - FOOTLOOSE!!! :)

Credit ‘‘Footloose’’ performed by Kenny Loggins (p) 1984 Sony Music Entertainment



It's taken us a while to upload it to our blog, because of technical problems... But it's finally uploaded!!!

Monday, 8 March 2010

Advertisement for our Digipak


We found, through research, the typical conventions of advertisements from the pop genre. We chose, again, to use bright colours as well as the black background that we had used in our digipak. We wanted the styles to be similar, so that they would appeal to the same audience.
The name of our artist is written in a large font across the top of the page - this was so that it stood out, as we considered it to be the most important part of an album or advertisement. We also found that similar advertisements used the same logo as that of the digipak design, so we incorporated this into our design.
We chose to write brief points, which highlight the main features of our digipak. This would appeal to the audience, making them want to buy it.
We thought the price of the album would be important for the viewers, as well as using the recognisable logos from well known stores that would sell our product.

We also included the record label and website information at the bottom of the page in a smaller font, as we found this was present in many existing advertisements.

How our Digipak is going to work...

For the inside of our digipak we decided on a similar colour scheme and to include silhouettes of the ''artist'' in stances representing dancing. We wanted it to look slightly different to the front and back covers, but still in keeping with our chosen genre - pop. We kept the original colour palette but enhanced the brightness. We used the same type-face for the artists name ''Kenny Loggins'', which we chose to position over both sides, cutting the name in half.

The CD will slot into the right side of the inside; acting as a flap or pocket. The left side will do the same job, but used for the dvd, or booklet.

Friday, 5 March 2010

Treatment

After researching and analysing existing music videos within the same genre (pop), and taking on board the various conventions. We collectively decided as a group that we would make a modernised version of Kenny loggins footloose. Using ideas of our own along with inspiration from other videos we have analysed will help us create a successful modernised version compared to that of the original.

This will result in us making a music video to fit the conventions of that of a pop genre. As the video was released in 1984 our video would have to be modernised significantly to the original version in regards to mise-en-scene and other conributing aspects. In regards to our editing the pace and timings will have to change throughout to fit the face paced song, with a variety of shots and editing tachniques ( cuts, fades etc) We will edit our video on final cut enabeling us to achieve this .

For our video we decided to have various mise-en-scenes, from kitchens/stables to our the main singer in a studio setting. This video is where we will need to consider the multiple narratives and characters, as we have collectively decided upon numerous of characters/narrative we have done this to make the video more convincing as we wanted the song to reflect peoples reactions when hearing the song, showing a true representayion of what it would be like for people listening to it in our video. This will result in us taking into consideration our video having many different mise-en-scenes which will vary with each character, not only with each individual character but also with the main peformer in a studio setting, this is a important part of the video as it’s the only break you have from the narration and is just merely a male standing and peforming which is in contrast with the upbeat/physical roles. This is where we will take full avantage of our editing skills to encorperate not only a wide range of characters to the fast pased beat but also a main solo peformer. The pace will be very upbeat like other music videos we analysed within the same genre as the pace quickens throughout the song the smaller the cuts of each character will become along with their actions becoming more intense (dancing etc) This will be done via editing we will do this to intensify the song and show the characters really getting into the music.

The lighting we will use will mainly be false due to most of our character being in indoor settings, this will come from the surrounding lights. The light will not be focused soley on a charater however as we want the setting to look as natural and spontaneous as possible, there should however not be a problem with lighting due to the windows etc. In regards to lighting of the studio we have decided to have the preformer against a black background, this is in contast to other vibrant scenes previously seen throughout the video. This will make the audience focus more on the perdominant peformer. The lighting will come from studio lighting focusing on the male peformer, however the light won’t be overpowering as it needs to keep in keeping with other shots. The variation may be too much if we focus to much on the solo performer.

The reason the treatment is was uploaded later than planned was due to technical difficulties. It had been completed before the uploaded date.